Homophobia Part 11: The Gay Bullies Part 5
Before I get to the Gay Stream Media’s little darling Dan Savage and all of his antics that those who are gay should loudly denounce and all the crickets I hear when looking for such denunciation, I want to recount a conversation I had recently. I was with a conservative friend who has a very close friend who secretly counsels local homosexuals who are trying to leave the lifestyle. This gentleman, whom I know as well, does his work in secret because of all the hate that tends to come in the form of rocks and flaming toilet paper rolls at anyone who’s willing to put their neck up in a crowd and point out that homosexuals can indeed leave the lifestyle. The other participant in this conversation is one of our liberal friends- the kind that wholeheartedly believes that we should start killing people because we’re running out of space to grow food and of natural resources. He also believes in global warming and just about every bit of nonsense being pumped out of the Democrat-party think tanks. As many times as I’ve tried to talk him out of his Malthusian mindset, it remains fruitless.
The three of us were sitting around contemplating life when the idea of Scouting came up in the context of gay recruitment. That evening, my conservative friend informed me that his friend who counsels had told him that gays actually call this recruitment process call “grooming.” Part of the reason gays hate these counselors is that they get a first hand look at the gay community’s secrets. Gays like to start grooming while the boys are in their early teens, and for this reason, they’ve had great success as Boy Scout leaders and Priests. We were talking about the Lockport, NY man and former Scout Leader who had finally pled guilty to reduced charges after fondling some young boys.
After I made the point that it is good for children that the Boy Scouts do not allow gay scout leaders, my liberal friend tried to correct me. Spouting NAMBLA literature turned Democrat Party talking points, my liberal friend tried to get us to believe that “pedophiles aren’t homosexuals, even though they’re molesting boys. They’re pedophiles.” We’ve all heard that one haven’t we? As I understand it though, pedophiles more often seek children, while pederasts are men who seek anal sex with boys. The term pederast is a better one to describe the Priests and Boy Scout leaders who predominantly seek out boys above the age of ten into the early teens. Regardless, does that not mean they are indeed homosexuals contrary to my friend’s assertion, which was obviously made because he has gay family friends whom he’d not want lumped in with such a vile group?
Of course they are. While not all homosexuals are pederasts, all pederasts are homosexuals. And this is where the left gleefully would sacrifice the safety of children in order to protect their big money gay constituents. They want to call the pederasts pedophiles and pretend that when a man seeks sex from a boy he isn’t a homosexual but rather pedophile. Furthermore they want to treat the idea that he’s a pedophile as if it were a mental disease and not a mental disease with sexual orientation issues at its foundation. As we know, many sexual orientation issues come from childhood abuse- both sexual and physical. So the idea that a man who rapes a boy isn’t a homosexual is just silly.
Let’s look at the words homosexual and heterosexual. Homo- is the Geek prefix to mean “same or of one kind.” Hetero- is the Greek prefix that means “other or different.” Sexual is used to describe gender as well as copulation. In other words, the word homosexual describes someone who copulates with someone of the same gender, while heterosexual describes someone who copulates with someone of a different gender. So when a man and a boy, who obviously share a gender, copulate, is that man not a homosexual? It’s the easiest question to answer in the world, unless you’re a liberal. It’s more proof that liberalism truly is a mental disease. Anyone who’d rather put young boys and girls at risk of homosexual molestation than admit that molesters who molest children of the same sex are homosexuals is surely in need of a mental tune-up.
And before I go further, I would like to repeat this. While not all homosexuals are pederasts out “grooming” young boys to be homosexuals when they grow up, all pederasts are. I am not smearing all homosexuals, but I would appreciate it if some in the homosexual community would step up and admit, “You know, some homosexuals are lowlife scum out to hurt children, so maybe the rules against gay Boy Scout leaders make sense.” Instead, I hear crickets. In fact, other than Tammy Bruce, I don’t hear any “moderate” homosexuals standing up and speaking out against the day-to-day cultural onslaught on Christians. Their silence suggests approval.
Just as the so-called moderate Muslims who supposedly are against the literal reading of the Koran and the terroristic attacks on civilization in the name of Mohammed and Allah never denounce their religious brothers without a “but” followed by an excuse for the actions and some sympathy, I don’t hear anything from any group of homosexuals who are against the redefinition of marriage and all the social repercussions that will follow. Not even the Log Cabin “Republicans” are against gay marriage. Instead, they’re for it. They approve of the cultural terrorism being waged against the American family that the radical gay agenda mob has unleashed. An unwillingness to admit that not all adherents of the gay lifestyle are perfectly kosher is an admission of approval of the hideous things done to regular folks in the name of mainstreaming homosexuality, or it’s an ignorance-is-bliss induced blindness. Or maybe it suggests that they fear what they know best, which is that the homosexual community can be extremely vicious to those whom they consider traitors to their lifestyle. In any case, I’m not impressed.
Here are some of the things that should be denounced but are celebrated instead.
Dan Savage- Liberal Media Darling
Whenever there’s a Republican who’s willing to stand up to the gay agenda bullies, Dan Savage has something to say about it. He’s been on CNN, ABC, HBO’s Bill Maher show, MSNBC, in Time and Newsweek, and was even written up as a “family man” in the New York Times Sunday Magazine.
Years ago, Rick Santorum pointed out that if we, as a society, use moral relativism to accept homosexual marriage, we will have trouble making a good argument against polygamy, incest and a other things we don’t talk about at the dinner table. He was making a legitimate slippery slope argument. Dan Savage bought the website www.spreadingsantorum.com, where he defined “Santorum” as something so disgusting that I won’t write it here. Now, whenever someone googles Santorum’s name, they are treated to this Dan Savage fantasy in the first few entries, and since Rick Santorum, conservative extraordinaire, is running for president, this will obviously hurt him in the eyes of unsuspecting folks who are unaware that someone as despicable Dan Savage exists.
Recently, on an episode of HBO’s Real Time With Bill Maher, the panel of lefties was yakking about Michelle Bachmann and her husband who may have actually counseled some homosexuals who were in need of dealing with their homosexuality. Because of this possibility, which I hope is true, many on the left have been spreading rumors that Marcus Bachmann is gay- because you know, only a homosexual repressing his homosexual feelings would even think about helping a homosexual out of the lifestyle. It’s the old, “Oh, you’re a homophobe. You must be gay like me.” Nonsense. Some of these celebrities include Jerry Seinfeld, John Stewart, Stephanie Miller, Randi Rhodes, Ron Reagan junior, Janine Garofalo, to name a few but not to forget Cher (good job on your daughter Chastity, I mean your son Chaz).
Here’s the transcript from that conversation:
DAN SAVAGE, SEX ADVICE COLUMNIST: They’re grifters and scumbags, the Bachmanns.
BILL MAHER, HOST: Grifters and scumbags.
MAHER: Not just one or the other.
SAVAGE: They’re not charming grifters like in the movie.
MAHER: No, no.
MARC MARON, COMEDIAN: I don’t want to be crass but I just hope that Marcus Bachmann takes all that, you know, rage that comes from repression and denial and brings it into the bedroom with her. I hope he f–ks her angrily because, because that’s how I would. And I’ve thought about it. I just…
[Laughter and applause]
MARON: …It’s a political statement I’m trying to make.
SAVAGE: Just so we get, just so you don’t get charges of sexism, because only Michele Bachmann was involved, I sometimes think about f–king the s–t out of Rick Santorum.
[Laughter and applause]
SAVAGE: Because I think…
MARON: I’m with you.
SAVAGE: …he needs it. So, it’s not, it’s not just women we’re talking about f–king. Like, let’s bone that Santorum boy.
MARON: Alright. Let’s video it.
SAVAGE: I’m up for whipping up some santorum in Santorum
Notice in the end that Dan Savage uses his own definition of “Santorum” in his gay fantasy. Another time on the same show, Dan Savage said of Republicans: “I wish they were they were all f**king dead!”
During the 2000 Republican primary campaign, Dan Savage bragged about having the flu and licking the doorknobs throughout Gary Bauer’s Iowa campaign headquarters to get as many of Gary Bauer’s folks sick during the campaign. Gary Bauer had a Christian view of homosexuality, so Dan had a responsibility to the gay gods to punish the Christian with the gay-flu plague- his own personal biological weapon.
His list of hedonistic belt notches goes on and on. If you’d like, you can read Newsbusters coverage of Dan Savage. He’s got a pretty sick mind, yet he’s beloved by liberals, and that’s because of what he does. He’s one of the main people behind the “It gets better” campaign that tries to get children to feel comfortable being gay because it supposedly gets better. These commercials are on TV sometimes. I suppose you’d see a bunch of them if you watch Glee or some other gay TV show. He’s also a famous sex columnist who gets to write about sex in the strip of paper by the horoscopes and the comics. And when you look at all the celebrities in his commercials, you immediately find out how mainstream and loved by the liberal elites this skinny little man, who wants to hate rape a conservative presidential candidate for president, is.
The Gay Nazis
So what makes some homosexuals so vile and yet so accepted in liberal society? How is it that this man Dan Savage can express such utter hate and not be snubbed by the liberal elite?
I’m running out of space, and my editor’s about to have my head, so I’ll be a bit brief. After reading about the fascist movement over the years, one of the things that one quickly discovers is how close the National Socialist (Nazi) movement was to the International Socialist (Communist) movement in the kinds of things they believed. Think about it, before Hitler violated the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact, Germany and the Soviet Union had peace. History, which is written by the victors (the Communist Russians were the victors of WWII along with the US and Britain), has been written to treat Communist socialism as good and Nazi socialism as capitalism, which liberals think is bad. But fascism was nothing of the sort. The first things that the Nazis did were to take the guns from the population, nationalize industries to build the war machine, and paganize the churches and educational system with Nazi teachings replacing those of the Bible. Yeah, I know, sounds like the Democrat Party. Just don’t get caught saying that out loud. Some gay liberal will scratch your eyeball out and start crying because he was offended.
In the build up of the Nazi State, Germany was going through a sexual liberation movement filled with vile porn and homosexuality everywhere. Hitler was fine with the homosexuality, as were the many fascist thinkers. Fascism was a liberal cultural phenomenon that the elites believed in and had to push it upon the regular folks, and as we know, they did.
It was after the German society had turned into the Sodom and Gomorrah of the 20th Century that the totalitarian regime was able to take over with ultimate power backed by the newly built war machine and the aged Hitler Youth who were brought up in the Nazi schooling with no true Christian teachings whatsoever. That’s how society collapses into the arms of dictatorship.
Many do not know the homosexual connection and driving force behind the building of Hitler. I have indeed mentioned it a few times before, especially Ernst Rohm’s role as the leader of the Brown Shirts or SA. Weirdly enough, I found the greatest description of Ernst Rohm in four specific paragraphs of an article by a self-described “gay left-wing man” Johann Hari in an article titled The Strange, Strange Story of Gay Fascists posted at the liberal Huffingtopost.
I actually recommend that you read the whole article. He covers many of the later fascist movements throughout Europe and their gay connections.
And this Gaystapo has an icon to revere, an alternative Fuhrer to worship: the lost gay fascist leader Ernst Rohm. Along with Adolf Hitler, Rohm was the founding father of Nazism. Born to conservative Bavarian civil servants in 1887, Ernst Rohm’s life began – in his view – in the “heroic” trenches of the First World War. Like so many of the generation who formed the Nazi Party, he was nurtured by and obsessed with the homoerotic myth of the trenches – heroic, beautiful boys prepared to die for their brothers and their country.
He emerged from the war with a bullet-scarred face and a reverence for war. As he put it in his autobiography, “Since I am an immature and wicked man, war and unrest appeal to me more than the good bourgeois order.” After being disbanded, he tried half-heartedly to get a foothold in civilian life, but he saw it as alien, bourgeois, boring. He had no political beliefs, only prejudices – particularly hatred of Jews. Historian Joachim Fest describes Rohm’s generation of alienated, demobbed young men humiliated by defeat as “agents of a permanent revolution without any revolutionary idea of the future, only a wish to eternalize the values of the trenches.”
It was Rohm who first spotted the potential of a soap-box ranter called Adolf Hitler. He saw him as the demagogue he needed to mobilize support for his plan to overthrow democracy and establish a “soldier’s state” where the army ruled untrammelled. He introduced the young fascist to local politicians and military leaders; they knew him for many years as “Rohm’s boy.” Gay historian Frank Rector notes, “Hitler was, to a substantial extent, Rohm’s protégé.” Rohm integrated Hitler into his underground movement to overthrow the Weimar Republic.
Rohm’s blatant, out homosexuality seems bizarre now, given the gay genocide that was to follow. He talked openly about his fondness for gay bars and Turkish baths, and was known for his virility. He believed that gay people were superior to straights, and saw homosexuality as a key principle of his proposed Brave New Fascist Order. As historian Louis Snyder explains, Rohm “projected a social order in which homosexuality would be regarded as a human behaviour pattern of high repute… He flaunted his homosexuality in public and insisted his cronies do the same. He believed straight people weren’t as adept at bullying and aggression as homosexuals, so homosexuality was given a high premium in the SA.” They promoted an aggressive, hypermasculine form of homosexuality, condemning “hysterical women of both sexes”, in reference to feminine gay men.
Later in the article, Johann Hari points out that if gay pornographer and film-maker “Bruce LaBruce is right, many of the mainstream elements of gay culture – body worship, the lauding of the strong, a fetish for authority figures and cruelty – provide a swamp in which the fascist virus can thrive.” Think of the Village People in leather Nazi garb and the bad guys from Mad Max 2: The Roadwarrior.
Well before I sign off, I just want to mention that the State of California recently passed a Governor Moonbeam-signed piece of legislation that mandates that schools teach gay history. The fine print, that I doubt you’ll see mentioned in much of the mainstream media coverage of this story, says that teachers are not allowed to talk about the dangers of homosexuality in regards to the diseases that run rampant in the homosexual community. Knowing that the children of California and eventually children across this country will soon be getting an education on all the gay heroes with none of the seedy, I’m going to tell you about the some of the gay heroes.
Tune in for Part 12- the Gay Heroes
In the mean time go read parts 1 through 10