You’ve Gotta Read This 9-8 Part 1
By Mack Rights
Sorry it’s been so long. Sometimes life kicks you in the teeth, and even though you have a lot to say, you don’t have the time to do it. So I’ll try to catch up. First though, I want to recommend that you read a couple of reviews that I’ve put out in the last couple of weeks, if you haven’t already. The first is of a movie called The Sunset Limited, staring Samuel L. Jackson as a Christian trying to talk an atheist, played by Tommy Lee Jones, out of committing suicide. The movie is profound in so many ways. The second is of a book called Darkness at Noon, by Arthur Koestler. It’s about the old Soviet purges, and specifically about a purger who gets purged himself after helping to create the monster society that turns on him. Then I relate it to a young commie-lib girl who knocks on our door trying to get us to sign a petition that would force us to give up our freedom of speech. She’s “the girl with the green hole in her ear.” I sure did have something to say to that girl. It’s worth the read. And that’s my not-very-humble-in-my-own-opinion review of my own review.
The Susan G. Komen for the Cure foundation has been in the news again. Karen Handel is the former vice president who had to step down after the abortionists went mad and tried to kill the foundation after it tried to stop giving money to Planned Parenthood. She was hired to get Komen disengaged from Planned Parenthood, but those that energize off the blood of the unborn would have none of it. So now, Karen Handel has written a book called “Planned Bullyhood” that will come out soon.
Here’s the thing, getting an abortion increases your chance of getting breast cancer because abortion prematurely halts the lactation process. Why would anyone in their right mind donate their money to a breast cancer organization that then donates part of that money to an abortion mill? It’s like hiring a careless mouse breeder to solve the neighborhood’s mouse problem. And what’s with the bracelets that children are wearing that read “I Love Boobies”? I don’t know that they come from Komen, but when a little girl wears that, boys think: “I want to know that girl. She likes boobies.” And when a boy wears it, his parents think, “Thank God he’s not gay.” Is there a double standard? You bet. My point, why are children wearing these bracelets? They only promote more sex by turning little girls into sexual objects. But there’s big money in sex. Unwanted pregnancies lead to abortions, abortions lead to breast cancer, and breast cancer cases lead to more people willing to donate to breast cancer foundations who then donate to abortion mills- the cycle of non-profit life.
So then I see that some garbage cans are decked out in Susan G. Komen pink with the ribbon. I’m thinking that that’s the perfect metaphor. Turning little girls into sex objects by giving them bracelets that draw others’ attentions to their breasts so that they get knocked up and have abortions- thus increasing their chances at getting breast cancer- is a process that could only be thought up by the godless liberals. And I’m glad they do repentance by putting their foundation colors on a garbage can. It’s the perfect metaphor.
Speaking of godless liberal sex objects, our friend Sandra Fluke introduced Bill Clinton at the Democrat National Convention the other night. She’s a professional liberal radical as this story discovers. If you’ll remember, Sandra Fluke is the Georgetown Law student who got in front of a congressional committee to tell them that after spending $150,000 in three years for law school, she couldn’t afford the $3,000 for contraception, but she needed to have a lot of sex. In other words, she wanted the taxpayers to pay for her contraception, which included abortions and abortion drugs as well as the birth control pill. Rush Limbaugh laughed about it and made the point that her parents must be proud that she essentially went on TV to claim that, because she has the right to have a lot of sex, she has the entitlement to the tools a sex fiend needs in order to remain unencumbered by what the President Obama would call the punishment of a baby. Rush got heck for calling her a “slut,” the Democrats said there was a “War on Women,” and President Obama called Sandra Fluke (rhymes with “truck”) to tell her that her parents should indeed be proud that she admitted on TV that she’s loves having lots of sex. That’s how the godless liberal mind thinks.
In any case, now Fluke says that, not only are we entitled to free abortions, contraception and abortion drugs, but we’re also entitled to taxpayer-funded sex changes. It seems she senses that she’s running out of people to have sex with, and now she wants the government to turn some chicks into girls with penises. Would an economist call that supply-side sexonomics? Knowing that those chicks would never be able to get her pregnant though, could that be considered another form of contraception? Just some questions to the Democrat Party’s new feminist hero. Essentially though, she’s saying to the magnificent Obama: “President Geppetto, Pinocchio wants to be a Real boy. Force the taxpayers make it so.”
In any case, isn’t it ironic that Sandra Fluke, who fired the first shot in the “War on Women,” introduced impeached President Bill Clinton at the convention? This is a guy who raped Juanita Broderick, and when he was done, he looked at her bruised face and said: “You better put some ice on that.” I know, the fawning liberals out there are thinking: “That’s so sweet. He was concerned about her face.” But he raped her.
Considering the fact that Obama and Clinton hate each other, going back to the primary campaign in 2008 where Obama destroyed Clinton’s old lady with a smug smirk on his face, what do you want to bet that one of Clinton’s demands of quid pro quo for doing the pro-Obama speech was to have Sandra Fluke on the same stage as him so they could share the green room together. Sandra Fluke is Clinton’s kind of intern.
Incidentally, a federal judge just ordered taxpayers to fund a sex-change surgery of a prisoner. Do they then have to fund the transfer from a prison for one sex to a prison of another? And do they have to fund extra protection in that new prison because other prisoners aren’t going to take too kindly to someone of the opposite sex looking at them in the shower? Liberals always create more problems when they try to fix the problems they perceive.
So of course it’s no surprise that the Democrats dropped “God” from their platform. They also dropped the assertion that Jerusalem should be Israel’s capitol. And that Hamas is a terrorist organization and should be isolated. Since Hilary Clinton just wrote a billion dollar check to that terrorist organization and a bunch of checks to others like them, that third part was not put back in, but they did undemocratically slam “God” and Jerusalem back in. Although the delegates voted three times against God and Jerusalem, they still put them back in. Their excuse was that it was Obama who forced them to do it, even though it’s been proven that he had previously been made aware that they were indeed left out. Only when the Jewish and Christian voters got uppity did the former Muslim President give in. But watch the video. Look at those self-described “Arab Democrats” scoff at God and Jerusalem. Paying attention liberal Jews? This is the party you have faith in. The word democratic does not describe this party.
Here’s a part of a creepy video from the Convention put out by the Democrat Party. In it, the narrator, says, “The government is the only thing we all belong to…” This is the Democrat Party getting back to its slavery roots. It’s like a slave saying, “The Massa is the only thing we all belong to…” And of course the Democrats in control of government would love for we the people to consider ourselves as slaves. Taxation is a form of slavery, and if we willingly allow them to increase the taxation, regulation and fees of everyday living, we willingly allow ourselves to be slaves to the government. Oh, but we already are.
There’s another pro-school-choice movie called “Won’t Back Down” coming out. We saw the preview before “2016: Obama’s America.” By the way go see that. In any case, the teachers unions are scared of this movie. It’s about parents who take over the failing school and go up against the union commissars. This looks great. Tell your liberal friends to see it- unless you don’t want their heads to explode. Then tell them not to watch this. They might learn something. I shouldn’t say that. Liberals never learn anything. They already know everything. Sorry. Just go watch it.
At the Democrat National Convention, the DNC did not allow Democrats to speak with conservative media. This is one of the few stories I read about this. There was a line that prevented conservative talk radio guys from talking with Democrats. There’s a reason for this. Whenever Democrats are asked sustentative questions by conservatives, the Democrats, intellectually unprepared to be challenged because they’ve grown up in a world without being challenged, fall apart. Their only answer to a conservative becomes, “You’re a racist.” That’s what it boils down to for the intellectually-challenged liberals. So, the DNC did what it had to do. They shut out the conservative media. This is not a knock at conservative media as much as it is a self-admission that liberals just aren’t able to debate on facts- because their whole case is based on feelings. Awe, poor little liberal is afraid to get a question from that mean old Republican.
This is one of my favorite speeches from the Democrat convention. It’s former Michigan governor Jennifer Granholm talking about how great Obama is for saving General Motors. Some call it a “melt down,” but I call it amazing speechifying. She is super animated and it is fun to watch. She riles the crowd as good as any of the 20th Century dictators. It’s amazing. Sure, the Democrat crowd isn’t as smart as a Republican crowd, but she gets right into their emotions. Before hand, it looks like she had two stiff drinks, three bong hits and a line of coke, but that seems to make her even better. As the speech goes on, you can see the pot kick in last. Watch and be amazed. It’s below the next couple of paragraphs.
However, I do have a bone to pick with her. Obama didn’t save the auto industry. Bush actually gave GM the original bridge loans of about $5 billion. This gave them time to restructure. However, they still had to file for bankruptcy, which they did indeed do. At that point, Obama gave them and lent them around $70 billion. The company did not have to go to the bankruptcy judge who would have divvied up the company appropriately. Instead, the Obama administration violated the rule of law by cutting out the senior bondholders. The shareholders received next to nothing as well as the bondholders. The company was then given to the UAW and to the government and to foreign entities. In other words, the company was taken from its rightful owners, the senior bondholders and lenders, and given to the same union that bankrupted it in the first place. At the time, GM was nothing more than a broke pension system and healthcare distributer to retired employees that tried to peddle cars to pay the debt service. Poor performance in the stock market in the first decade of the century left the pensions underfunded, and government mandates made health insurance very costly. The company went bankrupt because they couldn’t compete with non-unionized foreign car companies.
So, while GM is still technically in business, they still owe the government nearly $50 billion, and their market cap is only about $35 billion. Essentially, they’re still bankrupt. To fix that problem, Obama decreed that they didn’t have to pay taxes on about $20 billion in their income. In other words, in order to give them a shot at competing with Ford (no bailout), Chrysler (Italian-owned) and foreign car companies, Obama turned them into a non-profit organization. Like Planned Parenthood, they can make all the money they want, but they don’t have to pay taxes. And because they’re owned by the union, some of this money will come right back to the Democrats in the form of campaign contributions. So, if you’re out there thinking of buying a GM car and you don’t believe in gay marriage and killing the unborn, buy another brand of vehicle. GM is the official non-profit auto company of the radical homosexuals and the baby-sacrificing pagans. And that’s why we call it Government Motors. Nonetheless, Granholm’s speech is great. Truth isn’t always what makes a speech great- think of just about every Obama speech that some liberal thought was great. It wasn’t great because of truth- that’s for sure.
In between Sandra Fluke’s speech and Clinton’s speech, Elizabeth Warren, the fake American Indian from Harvard who’s running against Senator Scott Brown in Massachusetts, helped introduce Clinton. This gave Clinton a chance to congratulate Fluke in the green room on her great speech and ask her to wait there until he had finished his own speech. Granted, his speech was long and she was probably asleep by the time he’d finished, but hey, can’t blame a dirty old guy for trying. In any case, a descendant of Apache chief and warrior Geronimo was at the DNC. And even though he’s a member of the party of Andrew Jackson- the Indian-Remover-in-Chief- he calls Elizabeth Warren “a disgrace.” At least he was wearing feathers. She doesn’t even do that in her efforts to convince us she’s part Indian.
By the way, my favorite speech from both of the conventions is definitely that of Clint Eastwood. For all those silly liberals who think he shouldn’t have made this speech because at moments it didn’t sound like he knew what he was supposed to say, I have this to say: guess what, he wasn’t supposed to say anything. He was able to say whatever he wanted. And all the “umms and uhhs” were nothing more than a director preventing the scene from having no sound during the skit. We weren’t able to hear Obama’s answers because Obama refuses to answer questions from conservatives. Think about it, Eastwood has directed 8 movies in the last five years. Do you really think there was no method to his skit?
So anyway, this is my favorite speech, especially because Eastwood is one of my favorite actors. And now, Eastwood has answered critics- but he didn’t answer them to the liberal media. Instead, it was his hometown paper The Carmel Pine Cone. He said this:
President Obama is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people. Romney and Ryan would do a much better job running the country, and that’s what everybody needs to know. I may have irritated a lot of the lefties, but I was aiming for people in the middle… People should feel free to get rid of any polititian who’s not doing a good job.
His was an unscripted speech that couldn’t have been vetted, and it was just great. If you haven’t seen it, watch. It has inspired National Empty Chair Day, and liberals hate it because Obama isn’t used to being mocked. Here are some great empty chair photos- including Obama with Karl Marx, some military guys carrying Obama and Obama on Mt. Rushmore. But liberals will do anything to make sure that he is not mocked. However, as Eastwood said, “We own this country,” and “Poiticians are employees of ours.”
By the way, black conservative Kira Davis was kicked out of the MSNBC pavilion at the Dem Convention because she had a sign that said she was a black conservative for Romney. The secret service actually helped remove her. How pathetic are the liberals at NBC. They have to be protected from conservative black women by secret service. What a bunch of weasely little girlie girls the liberal media’s made of.
Powered by Facebook Comments